Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

The biker bar of Awkward Arguments. All views welcome, bring a thick skin.

Moderators: DU Admin, DU MOD

Post Reply
User avatar
JAF
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:41 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 668 times
Been thanked: 562 times

Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by JAF » Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:46 pm

THE CONVERSATION - Neil Shortland, Director, Center for Terrorism and Security Studies; Assistant Professor of Criminology and Justice Studies, University of Massachusetts Lowell - Allyssa McCabe, Professor of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell
https://theconversation.com/analyzing-o ... sts-122609

In the weeks following two mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, police forces across the United States made more than 20 arrests based on threats made on social media.

Police in Florida, for example, arrested an alleged white supremacist who, police said, threatened a shooting at a Walmart. Richard Clayton, 26, allegedly posted on Facebook, “3 more days of probation left then I get my AR-15 back. Don’t go to Walmart next week.”

People who are contemplating, or even planning, serious crimes rarely make such clear public declarations of their intent. However, they might leave clues that, if properly understood, could offer opportunities to avert tragedy. We have teamed up with computer scientist Anna Rumshisky to collect and analyze more than 185,000 words of extremist or hateful narratives published online by people who have then gone on to commit large-scale shootings or terrorist crimes.

We have also assembled a second, admittedly smaller, sample of over 50,000 words published online by people who did not go on to kill.

The key question for us was whether we could identify signals in online posts that could help police and other officials tell the difference between people who are upset and ranting online and those who intend to do real physical harm. We wondered if the way people express their feelings online could signal whether someone is a real-world danger or a Facebook fantasist.

The power of words
In the aftermath of many mass shootings or terrorist attacks, over the past two decades and around the world, media coverage often indicates that police had previously encountered the suspect.

During the buildup to a mass shooting or a solo terrorist attack, the planners often leak signals of what they’re about to do. A 2016 study found that in nearly 60% of lone-actor terrorist attacks, the person involved produced letters or public statements before the attack that outlined his or her beliefs – though not necessarily violent intent, like the Florida man did about Walmart. They need to maintain secrecy to carry out their plans, but these attackers may fear that if their motivations remain unknown, their actions will have no real meaning.

In the past, researchers have looked to various attributes of people’s behavior and personalities when seeking warning signs that they might become violent and dangerous to the public. But those signals were not enough to prevent many high-profile attacks. For instance, the FBI had analyzed the emails of Nidal Malik Hassan before he shot more than 30 people, killing 13, at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009.

Australian police had assessed Man Haron Moris as a potential risk to public safety the day before he took hostages in a Sydney coffee shop in 2014. Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who planned the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, was, as the reporter’s phrase often goes, “known to authorities,” as were the alleged perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, and terrorist incidents in Madrid, London and Paris, among others.

However, there is not yet a way to evaluate or understand the relationship between writing words of hate and taking action.

Fighting talk
It’s hard to draw strong conclusions from words posted on the internet: A person can post on Instagram about how much they go to the gym while in fact devouring their second delivery pizza of the day.

For years, looking at people’s words has been of little use. A U.K. investigation of the murder of a British soldier found that the killers’ expressions of desire to become a “martyr,” for instance, were dismissed as “a fairly standard example of [online] rhetoric,” rather than a serious indicator of violent intentions.

Yet research has shown that words can indeed be used as indicators of their authors’ psychological states. For instance, highly neurotic people are more likely to use first-person singulars, such as “I,” “me” and “mine.” By contrast, extroverts use more positive emotion words like “great,” “happy” and “amazing.” Social media posts have been used to diagnose personality, personal values and even depression.

Our work seeks to extend this research to the effort to prevent mass shootings and lone-actor terrorist attacks. We compared the online writings and postings of people who had allegedly committed a mass shooting or lone-offender terrorist attack to posts from people who had expressed ideological intent and motivation online, but had no violent plans or intent when they were intercepted by law enforcement. What we found was that there were key differences in how they use words. Those who engaged in real-world violence commented differently from enraged online commentators with no violent intent.

In particular, we have found that people who later became violent were more likely to use emotionally laden and specifically targeted words like “shit,” “hate,” “you” and “they.” Violent people were less likely to use words about the external world, such as “people,” “world,” “state” and “time.”

Our analysis continues, including looking at the structure of these two groups’ writing, such as how well they stay on topic or diverge into tangents. We are also using machine learning and natural language processing to develop automatic tools that could remove the need for human judgment and help analyze large swathes of text to minimize the psychological and physical burden on analysts.

Our findings are preliminary, but we are optimistic that these words can offer a window – and a warning – about individuals’ intentions. This work is by no means a standalone solution to gun violence or terrorism, but it might help, even as predicting and preventing these sorts of attacks remains incredibly difficult.



User avatar
JAF
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:41 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 668 times
Been thanked: 562 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by JAF » Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm

Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?

former_rwd
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:57 am
Has thanked: 150 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by former_rwd » Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:04 pm

JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
Given that the findings are preliminary, as per the article - that's still in the research / prototype phase, not in the actual applicable technology phase.

tck62
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 12:55 pm
Has thanked: 270 times
Been thanked: 434 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by tck62 » Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:05 pm

JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
I could not agree more with this premise, what it really means is we need to pump 4500 million into the FBI budget so we have the manpower to seek out and minimize these threats, even putting a tail on them if we need too.

User avatar
JAF
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 2:41 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 668 times
Been thanked: 562 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by JAF » Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:47 pm

former_rwd wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:04 pm
JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
Given that the findings are preliminary, as per the article - that's still in the research / prototype phase, not in the actual applicable technology phase.
Agree.

"Police in Florida, for example, arrested an alleged white supremacist who, police said, threatened a shooting at a Walmart. Richard Clayton, 26, allegedly posted on Facebook, “3 more days of probation left then I get my AR-15 back. Don’t go to Walmart next week.”

Will people be who are essentially stupid, and type the first thing that comes to mind, make such a system unmanageable. I am wondering what the strike rate might be; how many people write "stupid" vs those who have "intent".

User avatar
Cat's Paw
Posts: 4464
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 12:59 pm
Location: SE Michigan
Has thanked: 3095 times
Been thanked: 2880 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by Cat's Paw » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:09 pm

I'm sure we can id one or two.

User avatar
Cat's Paw
Posts: 4464
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 12:59 pm
Location: SE Michigan
Has thanked: 3095 times
Been thanked: 2880 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by Cat's Paw » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:12 pm

tck62 wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:05 pm
JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
I could not agree more with this premise, what it really means is we need to pump 4500 million into the FBI budget so we have the manpower to seek out and minimize these threats, even putting a tail on them if we need too.

Good. That's a jobs program.
People will be able to secure their basic physiological and safety needs.
They will feel a sense of belonging,
And they will find they are on the path to self actualization!

youtube.com/watch?v=L0PKWTta7lU
youtube.com/watch?v=L0PKWTta7lU


User avatar
GuideToACrazyWorld
Posts: 5206
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 1:31 pm
Location: California
Has thanked: 2352 times
Been thanked: 6095 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by GuideToACrazyWorld » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:27 pm

This interestingly dovetails on last nights "Why we Hate" episode. Part of the problem with the anonymous boards on the internet is the lines between what someone really means and what they are doing for a reaction gets blurred. Someone might post a Nazi meme becasue they are a white supremacist or they might do so just to laugh at the overt reaction of others. These two people will often use similar language and be indistinguishable. It's the lowest from of irony, but I'd expect it to produce a lot of false positives.

TruthSeeker
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2019 1:56 am
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by TruthSeeker » Fri Nov 01, 2019 8:07 am

A lot of it can be done with computer software looking for key words or phrases.
tck62 wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:05 pm
JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
I could not agree more with this premise, what it really means is we need to pump 4500 million into the FBI budget so we have the manpower to seek out and minimize these threats, even putting a tail on them if we need too.

User avatar
eponymousbosch?^
Posts: 2513
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 5:50 pm
Has thanked: 3007 times
Been thanked: 2976 times

Re: Analyzing online posts could help spot future mass shooters and terrorists

Post by eponymousbosch?^ » Sun Nov 03, 2019 9:12 pm

Cat's Paw wrote:
Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:12 pm
tck62 wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:05 pm
JAF wrote:
Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:49 pm
Does this mean that authorities are getting better at tracking down potential terrorists?
I could not agree more with this premise, what it really means is we need to pump 4500 million into the FBI budget so we have the manpower to seek out and minimize these threats, even putting a tail on them if we need too.

Good. That's a jobs program.
People will be able to secure their basic physiological and safety needs.
They will feel a sense of belonging,
And they will find they are on the path to self actualization!

youtube.com/watch?v=L0PKWTta7lU
youtube.com/watch?v=L0PKWTta7lU


Post Reply