(PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
- Z is for Zangie
- Posts: 10407
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2019 3:47 pm
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 4308 times
- Been thanked: 1517 times
(PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
Have a fabulous Friday! I have the next four days off so I am happy.
- GuideToACrazyWorld
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 1:31 pm
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 2318 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
SCOTUS is always a mixed bag of nuts for me, although the recent session seems to be leading in a concerning way.
- Tarmaque
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:41 am
- Location: Vancouver, USA
- Has thanked: 1265 times
- Been thanked: 2743 times
- Tarmaque
- Posts: 6611
- Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 11:41 am
- Location: Vancouver, USA
- Has thanked: 1265 times
- Been thanked: 2743 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
A mixed bag of nuts in the sense of we're always ruffling through them trying to find the cashew.GuideToACrazyWorld wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 3:43 pmSCOTUS is always a mixed bag of nuts for me, although the recent session seems to be leading in a concerning way.
- GuideToACrazyWorld
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 1:31 pm
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 2318 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
Yeah, and it's a generic can from Walmart, you get like 3 cashews halves, 1 brazil nut and the rest are peanuts.
- GuideToACrazyWorld
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 1:31 pm
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 792 times
- Been thanked: 2318 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
Yeah, and it's a generic can from Walmart, you get like 3 cashews halves, 1 brazil nut and the rest are peanuts.
- Z is for Zangie
- Posts: 10407
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2019 3:47 pm
- Location: OH
- Has thanked: 4308 times
- Been thanked: 1517 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
Good for them, others I have read are doing similarTarmaque wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 8:36 pmIn reference to an earlier conversation:
https://lite.cnn.com/en/article/h_e8c8b ... 3a1bfa515d
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
Today, SCOTUS asked the state of Maryland to put a halt to protests outside the residences of the Justices. They seem to feel it’s a bit too intrusive, and would like their privacy back.
Given that a recent ruling of theirs will have the effect of relentless state intrusion into the private lives of all women of childbearing age in half of the states of the USA, along with private “bounty hunters” spying on women in those states, I’m not so sure Maryland should do that.
But it demonstrates the following: the Right only truly cares about one Right - the 2nd Amendment. That the Court is asking Maryland to do away with the right to peaceably assemble and the right to petition for redress of grievances, in order to accommodate the personal comfort of the Justices, speaks volumes.
Given that a recent ruling of theirs will have the effect of relentless state intrusion into the private lives of all women of childbearing age in half of the states of the USA, along with private “bounty hunters” spying on women in those states, I’m not so sure Maryland should do that.
But it demonstrates the following: the Right only truly cares about one Right - the 2nd Amendment. That the Court is asking Maryland to do away with the right to peaceably assemble and the right to petition for redress of grievances, in order to accommodate the personal comfort of the Justices, speaks volumes.
-
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2019 1:58 am
- Has thanked: 270 times
- Been thanked: 279 times
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
This court has cheapened the constitution . . . no one, not even the constitution, gave them the right to take away rights.
This is 5 people trying to take congressional and executive power for themselves . . .
This is 5 people trying to take congressional and executive power for themselves . . .
Re: (PO) The Supreme Court is really getting on my nerves.
What irks me is that the Justices who expanded those rights in the 60s and 70s were NOT flaming liberals. They were essentially people who were personally conservatives (small c). Their allegiance was to the nation and the constitution, and they saw that expansion of rights was inline with both the document and with the intent of the framers (who, aside from the slave states, were in favor of the expansion of the rights of black people). The current Court is the first that is so ideologically bound - and their ideology is to take away rights. That is incredibly dangerous.